Skip to main content

Establishment profile

JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO

4651 F ST, OMAHA, NE, 68117
Operated by James Skinner Baking Company
424490Other Grocery and Related Products Merchant Wholesalers

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
6
over 19 years
Violations
8
$29,373 in penalties
Penalties
$29,373
$3,672 avg
Violations across 3 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
1 hospitalizations · 2 National Emphasis Program inspections · 1 OSHA follow-up

Summary

JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO has accumulated 8 OSHA violations across 6 inspections over 19 years of recorded history, with $29,373 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 79th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 44 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 98th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 2 years ago.

Federal records were found in 3 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO appears in OSHA workplace safety, WHD wage enforcement, NLRB labor relations, and FMCSA motor carrier registration records only. No matching records were found in MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
6
0.3 / yr · last 19 yrs
Violations
8
0.4 / yr
Penalties
$29,373
$3,672 avg / violation
50% serious50% other
Inspection trigger · referral
3 of 6
Inspection trigger · complaint
2 of 6

83% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 3 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 8 distinct standards shown · 8 citations in this view · $29,373 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1910.0212 A0111$6,630Jun 2019Jun 2019
29 CFR 1910.0212 A03 II11$5,600Jan 2016Jan 2016
29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I11$5,171Jul 2024Jul 2024
29 CFR 1910.0147 C06 I11$5,171Jul 2024Jul 2024
29 CFR 1904.0039 A0211$3,800Jan 2016Jan 2016
29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 IV D11$3,000Dec 2017Dec 2017
29 CFR 1904.0029 B0311Jan 2016Jan 2016
29 CFR 1910.1200 E01 II11Sep 2015Sep 2015

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

79th

Above average violations in NAICS 4244 within NE. Peer group: 44 employers. This establishment has 8 OSHA violations; peer median is 1.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
98th
peer median: $925
Inspection frequency
98th
peer median: 1

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
7.7
vs industry
+4.3
TRIR
8.4
vs industry
+4.2

Reported for 450 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
4.2
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
3.4
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
8.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Planned
1
Complaint
2
Referral
3

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Oct 2015 – Feb 2022 · 1 in last 5 years

Reports
7
Hospitalizations
1
Amputations
7
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Feb 28, 2022Struck by or caught in swinging door or gateFingertip(s)Amputation
Dec 10, 2019Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects, unspecifiedFingertip(s)Amputation
Sep 26, 2019Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaningFingertip(s)Amputation
Sep 23, 2017Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operationFinger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.Amputation
Sep 1, 2017Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaningFingertip(s)Amputation
Oct 31, 2015Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operationFingertip(s)Amputation
Oct 22, 2015Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaningFingertip(s)Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Jan 19, 2019Amputated,Amputation,Caught Between,Chain,Conveyor,Finger,Food processing,Machine Guarding,Nip Point,Sprocket1
Oct 22, 2018Backing Up,Face,Forklift,Fracture,Laceration,Pallet,Pinned,Rib11
Sep 23, 2017Amputated,Finger,Sealing Machine,Struck Against2

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
2 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 2+ years. Most recent activity: 2 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

Cases
1
Back wages owed
$35,251
Employees affected
12

Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division — minimum-wage, overtime, child-labor, FMLA, and prevailing-wage enforcement.

Wage and hour breakdown by law

Per-statute totals across all closed DOL Wage & Hour cases against this employer. Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty is the separate fine where applicable. Some acts (Davis-Bacon, SCA, CWHSSA, H-2B, CCPA) don't carry a civil penalty field in DOL's data. 2 statutes · 16 violations · $35,251 in backwages · $1,870 in civil penalties

StatutePeriodCasesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
FLSA — minimum wage & overtimeApr 200711110$35,251
FLSA Child Labor
2 minors involved
Apr 200715$1,870

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database, aggregated per statute. Lifetime totals. A case can cite multiple statutes — so the total here may exceed the case count in the table above.

Wage and hour cases

Closed DOL Wage & Hour Division cases (FLSA, FMLA, H-2B, MSPA, and related statutes). Backwages reflect amounts the agency assessed; civil penalty (CMP) is a separate fine levied on top, where the statute provides for one (FLSA / H-1B / H-2A / MSPA / FMLA / EPPA / FLSA Child Labor; other acts have no CMP column in DOL’s data). The Statutes column lists which laws each case cited. 1 case · 16 violations · $35,251 in backwages · $1,870 in civil penalties · 12 workers affected · 1 child-labor case (2 minors)

Case periodIndustryStatutesViolationsWorkersBackwagesCivil penalty
Apr 2005 – Apr 2007Commercial BakeriesFLSAChild Labor
2 minors
1612$35,251$1,870

Source: DOL WHD enforcement database. Cases shown reflect those the agency has closed and made public. A violation count is the agency’s tally of cited violations (one violation can affect many workers); the workers column counts distinct employees the agency found to be affected.

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in NE — for James Skinner Baking Company, not this location alone

Total cases
3
Unfair labor practice
3

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other James Skinner Baking Company locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 3 cases · 3 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
14-CA-215272Unfair labor practiceFeb 2018May 2018ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-211850Unfair labor practiceDec 2017Mar 2018ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri
14-CA-205988Unfair labor practiceSep 2017Nov 2017ClosedRegion 14, Saint Louis, Missouri

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Motor carrier safety (FMCSA)

DOT number
554299
Operation
A

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration — DOT-regulated carrier registration and fleet data.

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2024-02-06Programmed Related22$10,343
2019-01-28Referral11$6,630
2018-11-07Referral0$0
2017-09-12Complaint1$3,000
2015-11-05Referral31$9,400
2015-05-12Complaint1$0

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO is one of 1 establishments rolled up under the parent organization James Skinner Baking Company.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of James Skinner Baking Company across all 1 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in other grocery and related products merchant wholesalers within NE, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO from every major federal compliance and enforcement source. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup James Skinner Baking Company.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO's OSHA violation history?
JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO has 6 OSHA inspections on record with 8 violations and $29,372.8 in total penalties.
How does JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO's safety record compare to its industry?
JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO operates in the other grocery and related products merchant wholesalers industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 4.2. JAMES SKINNER BAKING CO's self-reported DART rate is 7.73 compared to an industry average of 3.4.