Establishment profile
HEXCEL CORPORATION
1214 W GILA BEND HWY, CASA GRANDE, AZ, 85122
336413 — Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
EIN 941109521
Summary
HEXCEL CORPORATION has accumulated 16 OSHA violations across 7 inspections over 31 years of recorded history, with $9,919 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 85th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 86 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 8 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
HEXCEL CORPORATION appears in OSHA workplace safety and EPA environmental compliance records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
43% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 3 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 15 distinct standards shown · 16 citations in this view · $9,919 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 2 | 2 | $6,563 | Dec 2014 | Apr 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 C02 I | 1 | 1 | $1,406 | Dec 2014 | Dec 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1050 K03 I | 1 | 1 | $975 | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1050 E08 | 1 | 1 | $975 | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | — | Apr 2018 | Apr 2018 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0219 D01 | 1 | 1 | — | Dec 2014 | Dec 2014 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1050 K03 II | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1050 M02 I | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0141 B02 II | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 H02 III | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0151 C | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1050 I01 | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1050 J01 I | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1050 J03 II | 1 | 1 | — | Sep 1995 | Sep 1995 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3364 within AZ. Peer group: 86 employers. This establishment has 16 OSHA violations; peer median is 6.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 311 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for HEXCEL CORPORATION. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 8+ years. Most recent activity: 8 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for HEXCEL CORPORATION. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for HEXCEL CORPORATION. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for HEXCEL CORPORATION. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for HEXCEL CORPORATION. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
EPA Enforcement and Compliance History — Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act. Status: No Violation Identified.
EPA-registered facilities
Every EPA ECHO facility associated with this employer, sorted most-significant first. Each row links to EPA’s Detailed Facility Report for the source-of-truth record. Permits column lists active programs (Air = Clean Air Act, Water = Clean Water Act, RCRA = hazardous waste, TRI = Toxics Release Inventory reporting). 2 facilities.
| Facility | Permits | Status | Inspections | Formal actions | Penalties | Last inspected | ECHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEXCEL CORPORATION 1214 W GILA BEND HWY · CASA GRANDE, AZ, 85122 | WaterRCRA | No Violation Identified | 1 | 0 | — | May 2025 | View → |
HEXCEL CORP 1214 W HIGHWAY 84 · CASA GRANDE, AZ, 85122 | AirTRI | No Violation Identified | 1 | 0 | — | Jun 2023 | View → |
Source: EPA ECHO (Enforcement and Compliance History Online). Compliance status follows EPA’s own labels (“Sig Violation” = significant noncompliance; QNCR = quarters of noncompliance over the recent reporting window). Inactive facilities (struck through) retain historical enforcement records even after operations ceased.
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for HEXCEL CORPORATION. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
Consolidated across all USAspending recipient entities under this corporate parent — not attributable to this single location.
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 327215 - GLASS PRODUCT MANUFACTURING MADE OF PURCHASED GLASS. Last action: 2025-06-12. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-22 | Referral | 2 | 1 | $3,750 | |
| 2014-09-22 | Complaint | 3 | 3 | $4,219 | |
| 2003-05-29 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2001-05-10 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2001-05-01 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1997-03-20 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1995-06-14 | Complaint | 11 | 4 | $1,950 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing within AZ, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- ProActive Technologies, Inc.Tucson — 2 federal enforcement records
- LYNCH BROS. MFG. CO.PHOENIX — 1 federal enforcement record
- ADVANCED CERAMICS MANUFACTURINGTUCSON — 1 federal enforcement record
- BAE SYSTEMS AEROSPACE & DEFENSE GROUP INC.PHOENIX — 1 federal enforcement record
- MAXOL STUDIOS, LLCCHANDLER — 1 federal enforcement record
- HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.ORO VALLEY — 1 federal enforcement record
- ARIZONA AIRCRAFT SPARES INC.TUCSON — 1 federal enforcement record
- ACCESSORY OVERHAUL GROUP, INC.PHOENIX — 1 federal enforcement record
- SPACE AGE METALCRAFT, INC.PHOENIX — 1 federal enforcement record
- JET PRODUCTS CO., INC.PHOENIX — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in AZState-wide enforcement data
- Other Aircraft Parts in AZIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on HEXCEL CORPORATION from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is HEXCEL CORPORATION's OSHA violation history?
- HEXCEL CORPORATION has 7 OSHA inspections on record with 16 violations and $9,918.75 in total penalties.
- How does HEXCEL CORPORATION's safety record compare to its industry?
- HEXCEL CORPORATION operates in the other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.1. HEXCEL CORPORATION's self-reported DART rate is 0 compared to an industry average of 1.3.