Establishment profile
CITY OF MEDFORD
1107 STEWART AVE, MEDFORD, OR, 97501
Operated by City of Medford · 1 of 7 establishments
922160 — Fire Protection
EIN 936002207
Summary
CITY OF MEDFORD has accumulated 48 OSHA violations across 28 inspections over 38 years of recorded history, with $6,785 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 95th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 350 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 98th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 2 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
CITY OF MEDFORD appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
71% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 11 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 20 distinct standards shown · 23 citations in this view · $6,255 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 B09 | 2 | 2 | $345 | Sep 1991 | Nov 2023 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 III | 2 | 2 | — | Jun 1998 | Dec 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B02 | 2 | 2 | — | Apr 2001 | Apr 2001 |
| 29 CFR 1926.0652 A01 | 1 | 1 | $500 | May 2007 | May 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1926.0651 C02 | 1 | 1 | $500 | May 2007 | May 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1926.0651 K01 | 1 | 1 | $500 | May 2007 | May 2007 |
| 29 CFR 1926.1101 K01 | 1 | 1 | $500 | Dec 2002 | Dec 2002 |
| 29 CFR 7020.22307 I | 1 | 1 | $500 | Jun 1998 | Jun 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0120 Q01 | 1 | 1 | $500 | Sep 1991 | Sep 1991 |
| 29 CFR 7151.002003 | 1 | 1 | $500 | Sep 1991 | Sep 1991 |
| 29 CFR 7020.24207 A | 1 | 1 | $300 | Sep 1991 | Sep 1991 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0028 B01 I | 1 | 1 | $270 | Nov 2023 | Nov 2023 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0213 C01 | 1 | 1 | $270 | Nov 2023 | Nov 2023 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0022 C | 1 | 1 | $270 | Nov 2023 | Nov 2023 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0213 I01 | 1 | 1 | $240 | Feb 1993 | Feb 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0110 D10 | 1 | 1 | $240 | Feb 1993 | Feb 1993 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 1 | 1 | $210 | Apr 2001 | Apr 2001 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0215 A04 | 1 | 1 | $210 | Jun 1998 | Jun 1998 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0134 F02 | 1 | 1 | $200 | Oct 2004 | Oct 2004 |
| 29 CFR 1926.1101 F02 I | 1 | 1 | $200 | Dec 2002 | Dec 2002 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than nearly every other employer in NAICS 9221 within OR. Peer group: 350 employers. This establishment has 48 OSHA violations; peer median is 3.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 686 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for CITY OF MEDFORD. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 2+ years. Most recent activity: 2 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for CITY OF MEDFORD. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for CITY OF MEDFORD. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for CITY OF MEDFORD. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for CITY OF MEDFORD. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for CITY OF MEDFORD. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for CITY OF MEDFORD. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
- Department of Homeland SecuritySTAFFING FOR ADEQUATE FIRE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE (SAFER)assistance · Last action 2023-09-15$2,546,655
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2021-07-14$958,225
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2021-11-17$754,194
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2021-02-17$735,424
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS/ENTITLEMENT GRANTSassistance · Last action 2022-09-08$734,360
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM PROVIDES ANNUAL GRANTS ON A FORMULA BASIS TO STATES, CITIES, AND COUNTIES TO DEVELOP VIABLE URBAN COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING DECENT HOUSING AND A SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT, AND BY EXPANDING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES, PRINCIPALLY FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. THE PROGRAM IS AUTHORIZED UNDER TITLE 1 OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, PUBLIC LAW 93-383, AS AMENDED 42 U.S.C. 5301 ET SEQ. THE CDBG PROGRAM COVERS FOUR DISTINCT PROGRAMS, EACH WITH THEIR OWN SET OF GOVERNING REGULATIONS: CDBG ENTITLEMENT, CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII, CDBG INSULAR AREAS, AND STATE CDBG. IN THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM, HUD AWARDS GRANTS TO ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITY GRANTEES TO CARRY OUT A WIDE RANGE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITIES DEVELOP THEIR OWN PROGRAMS AND FUNDING PRIORITIES. IN THE CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII PROGRAM, THREE COUNTIES QUALIFY: HAWAII, KAUAI, AND MAUI. THE FY 2004 APPROPRIATIONS ACT REQUIRED THE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII TO DECIDE IF THE STATE WISHED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM BY JULY 31, 2004. THE STATE MADE THE DECISION NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. AS A RESULT OF THIS DECISION HUD'S HONOLULU FIELD OFFICE ADMINISTERS THE NON-ENTITLED GRANTS IN HAWAII. FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED USING A FORMULA BASED ON POPULATION, POVERTY, AND HOUSING OVERCROWDING, WITH THE POVERTY FACTOR CARRYING A DOUBLE WEIGHT. FOR THE CDBG INSULAR AREAS PROGRAM, HUD ANNUALLY ALLOCATES CDBG GRANTS TO FOUR DESIGNATED AREAS: AMERICAN SAMOA; GUAM; NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS; AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. THE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED IN PROPORTION TO THE POPULATIONS OF THE ELIGIBLE TERRITORIES. THE PROGRAM IS ADMINISTERED BY HUD'S FIELD OFFICES IN PUERTO RICO AND HAWAII. UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES PASS THROUGH CDBG GRANTS TO UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ANNUALLY, EACH STATE DEVELOPS FUNDING PRIORITIES AND CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROJECTS. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS. NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS INCLUDE THOSE UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHICH DO NOT RECEIVE CDBG FUNDS DIRECTLY FROM HUD. GENERALLY, NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS ARE CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 50,000 (EXCEPT CITIES THAT ARE DESIGNATED PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS), AND COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 200,000. CURRENT CDBG AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS LIST OF HUD COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD) AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/ALLOCATIONS-AWARDS/; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: CDBG FUNDS MAY BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY; RELOCATION AND DEMOLITION; REHABILITATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES; CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES, STREETS, NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS, AND THE CONVERSION OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS FOR ELIGIBLE PURPOSES; PUBLIC SERVICES, WITHIN CERTAIN LIMITS; ACTIVITIES RELATING TO ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE TO PROFIT-MOTIVATED BUSINESSES TO CARRY OUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOB CREATION/RETENTION ACTIVITIES. EACH ACTIVITY MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING NATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROGRAM: BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS, PREVENTION OR ELIMINATION OF SLUMS OR BLIGHT, OR ADDRESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY BECAUSE EXISTING CONDITIONS POSE A SERIOUS AND IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE HEALTH OR WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY FOR WHICH OTHER FUNDING IS NOT AVAILABLE. GENERALLY, THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ACTIVITIES ARE INELIGIBLE: ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, OR RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS FOR THE GENERAL CONDUCT OF GOVERNMENT; POLITICAL ACTIVITIES; CERTAIN INCOME PAYMENTS; CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING (WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS). UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES MAY USE $100,000 PLUS UP TO A MAXIMUM OF THREE PERCENT OF ITS CDBG ALLOCATION. AMOUNTS EXPENDED ON ADMINISTRATION IN EXCESS OF $100,000 MUST BE MATCHED. STATES MAY EXPEND UP TO THREE PERCENT OF THEIR CDBG ALLOCATION ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, THE TOTAL A STATE SPENDS ON BOTH ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EXPENSES MAY NOT EXCEED $100,000 PLUS THREE PERCENT OF THE STATE'S ALLOCATION. CPD HAS DEVELOPED PROFILES THAT DISPLAY GRANTEE-REPORTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR SELECTED HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, AND PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES. PROFILES FOR GRANTEES WILL VARY, AS GRANTEES HAVE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING THE HOUSING, ECONOMIC, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES THEY CARRY OUT WITH CDBG FUNDS. THE MOST RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS CAN BE VIEWED WITHIN THE NATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/PROGRAMS/CDBG/CDBG-ACCOMPLISHMENT-REPORTS/; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: THE CDBG PROGRAM REINFORCES SEVERAL IMPORTANT VALUES AND PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY TO EMPOWER PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT STRATEGIES TAILORED TO THEIR OWN NEEDS AND PRIORITIES; AN EMPHASIS ON CONSOLIDATED PLANNING THAT EXPANDS AND STRENGTHENS PARTNERSHIPS AMONG ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN ENHANCING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES AND SET-ASIDE FOR GRANTEES TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF THESE PARTNERS. EACH CDBG GRANTEE’S EXPECTED OUTCOMES ARE DESCRIBED AS GOALS IN THEIR CONSOLIDATED PLAN. THE MOST RECENT CONSOLIDATED PLANS CAN BE VIEWED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/REPORTS/#CONSOLIDATED-PLANS-ANNUAL-ACTION-PLANS-AND-CAPERS; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: OVER A 1, 2, OR 3-YEAR PERIOD, AS SELECTED BY THE GRANTEE, NOT LESS THAN 70 PERCENT OF CDBG FUNDS MUST BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES THAT BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. HUD DOES NOT PROVIDE CDBG ASSISTANCE DIRECTLY TO INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, NONPROFIT OR ORGANIZATIONS OR OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROGRAM, SHOULD CONTACT THEIR LOCAL MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY OFFICIALS TO FIND OUT HOW THE PROGRAM OPERATES IN THEIR COMMUNITY. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS MAY DIFFER FROM ONE GRANTEE TO ANOTHER. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANTEE ADMINISTERS THE CDBG PROGRAM AND DETERMINES WHICH LOCAL PROJECTS RECEIVE FUNDING. ELIGIBLE GRANTEES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAS); OTHER METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 50,000; QUALIFIED URBAN COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 200,000 (EXCLUDING THE POPULATION OF ENTITLED CITIES); STATES AND INSULAR AREAS. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS FUNDED UNDER THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM. THE STATE OF HAWAII DOES NOT PARTICIPATE, AND HUD ALLOCATES THE STATE'S SHARE OF FUNDS TO THE THREE HAWAII NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES. THE STATES ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS.; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2024-10-29$687,332
- Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentPURPOSE: THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM PROVIDES ANNUAL GRANTS ON A FORMULA BASIS TO STATES, CITIES, AND COUNTIES TO DEVELOP VIABLE URBAN COMMUNITIES BY PROVIDING DECENT HOUSING AND A SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT, AND BY EXPANDING ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES, PRINCIPALLY FOR LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. THE PROGRAM IS AUTHORIZED UNDER TITLE 1 OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, PUBLIC LAW 93-383, AS AMENDED 42 U.S.C. 5301 ET SEQ. THE CDBG PROGRAM COVERS FOUR DISTINCT PROGRAMS, EACH WITH THEIR OWN SET OF GOVERNING REGULATIONS: CDBG ENTITLEMENT, CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII, CDBG INSULAR AREAS, AND STATE CDBG. IN THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM, HUD AWARDS GRANTS TO ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITY GRANTEES TO CARRY OUT A WIDE RANGE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES. ENTITLEMENT COMMUNITIES DEVELOP THEIR OWN PROGRAMS AND FUNDING PRIORITIES. IN THE CDBG NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES IN HAWAII PROGRAM, THREE COUNTIES QUALIFY: HAWAII, KAUAI, AND MAUI. THE FY 2004 APPROPRIATIONS ACT REQUIRED THE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII TO DECIDE IF THE STATE WISHED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM BY JULY 31, 2004. THE STATE MADE THE DECISION NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM. AS A RESULT OF THIS DECISION HUD'S HONOLULU FIELD OFFICE ADMINISTERS THE NON-ENTITLED GRANTS IN HAWAII. FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED USING A FORMULA BASED ON POPULATION, POVERTY, AND HOUSING OVERCROWDING, WITH THE POVERTY FACTOR CARRYING A DOUBLE WEIGHT. FOR THE CDBG INSULAR AREAS PROGRAM, HUD ANNUALLY ALLOCATES CDBG GRANTS TO FOUR DESIGNATED AREAS: AMERICAN SAMOA; GUAM; NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS; AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS. THE FUNDS ARE ALLOCATED IN PROPORTION TO THE POPULATIONS OF THE ELIGIBLE TERRITORIES. THE PROGRAM IS ADMINISTERED BY HUD'S FIELD OFFICES IN PUERTO RICO AND HAWAII. UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES PASS THROUGH CDBG GRANTS TO UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT. ANNUALLY, EACH STATE DEVELOPS FUNDING PRIORITIES AND CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROJECTS. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS. NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS INCLUDE THOSE UNITS OF GENERAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT WHICH DO NOT RECEIVE CDBG FUNDS DIRECTLY FROM HUD. GENERALLY, NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS ARE CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 50,000 (EXCEPT CITIES THAT ARE DESIGNATED PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS), AND COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF LESS THAN 200,000. CURRENT CDBG AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN THIS LIST OF HUD COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (CPD) AWARDS AND ALLOCATIONS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/ALLOCATIONS-AWARDS/; ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: CDBG FUNDS MAY BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY; RELOCATION AND DEMOLITION; REHABILITATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES; CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS, SUCH AS WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES, STREETS, NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS, AND THE CONVERSION OF SCHOOL BUILDINGS FOR ELIGIBLE PURPOSES; PUBLIC SERVICES, WITHIN CERTAIN LIMITS; ACTIVITIES RELATING TO ENERGY CONSERVATION AND RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE TO PROFIT-MOTIVATED BUSINESSES TO CARRY OUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOB CREATION/RETENTION ACTIVITIES. EACH ACTIVITY MUST MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING NATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR THE PROGRAM: BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS, PREVENTION OR ELIMINATION OF SLUMS OR BLIGHT, OR ADDRESS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS HAVING A PARTICULAR URGENCY BECAUSE EXISTING CONDITIONS POSE A SERIOUS AND IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE HEALTH OR WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY FOR WHICH OTHER FUNDING IS NOT AVAILABLE. GENERALLY, THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF ACTIVITIES ARE INELIGIBLE: ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, OR RECONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS FOR THE GENERAL CONDUCT OF GOVERNMENT; POLITICAL ACTIVITIES; CERTAIN INCOME PAYMENTS; CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING (WITH SOME EXCEPTIONS). UNDER THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, STATES MAY USE $100,000 PLUS UP TO A MAXIMUM OF THREE PERCENT OF ITS CDBG ALLOCATION. AMOUNTS EXPENDED ON ADMINISTRATION IN EXCESS OF $100,000 MUST BE MATCHED. STATES MAY EXPEND UP TO THREE PERCENT OF THEIR CDBG ALLOCATION ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES. HOWEVER, THE TOTAL A STATE SPENDS ON BOTH ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE EXPENSES MAY NOT EXCEED $100,000 PLUS THREE PERCENT OF THE STATE'S ALLOCATION. CPD HAS DEVELOPED PROFILES THAT DISPLAY GRANTEE-REPORTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS FOR SELECTED HOUSING, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, AND PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES. PROFILES FOR GRANTEES WILL VARY, AS GRANTEES HAVE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING THE HOUSING, ECONOMIC, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES THEY CARRY OUT WITH CDBG FUNDS. THE MOST RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS CAN BE VIEWED WITHIN THE NATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORTS LOCATED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/PROGRAMS/CDBG/CDBG-ACCOMPLISHMENT-REPORTS/; EXPECTED OUTCOMES: THE CDBG PROGRAM REINFORCES SEVERAL IMPORTANT VALUES AND PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: PROGRAM FLEXIBILITY TO EMPOWER PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES TO DESIGN AND IMPLEMENT STRATEGIES TAILORED TO THEIR OWN NEEDS AND PRIORITIES; AN EMPHASIS ON CONSOLIDATED PLANNING THAT EXPANDS AND STRENGTHENS PARTNERSHIPS AMONG ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN ENHANCING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES AND SET-ASIDE FOR GRANTEES TO BUILD THE CAPACITY OF THESE PARTNERS. EACH CDBG GRANTEE’S EXPECTED OUTCOMES ARE DESCRIBED AS GOALS IN THEIR CONSOLIDATED PLAN. THE MOST RECENT CONSOLIDATED PLANS CAN BE VIEWED AT: HTTPS://WWW.HUDEXCHANGE.INFO/GRANTEES/REPORTS/#CONSOLIDATED-PLANS-ANNUAL-ACTION-PLANS-AND-CAPERS; INTENDED BENEFICIARIES: OVER A 1, 2, OR 3-YEAR PERIOD, AS SELECTED BY THE GRANTEE, NOT LESS THAN 70 PERCENT OF CDBG FUNDS MUST BE USED FOR ACTIVITIES THAT BENEFIT LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME PERSONS. HUD DOES NOT PROVIDE CDBG ASSISTANCE DIRECTLY TO INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, NONPROFIT OR ORGANIZATIONS OR OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROGRAM, SHOULD CONTACT THEIR LOCAL MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY OFFICIALS TO FIND OUT HOW THE PROGRAM OPERATES IN THEIR COMMUNITY. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS MAY DIFFER FROM ONE GRANTEE TO ANOTHER. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT GRANTEE ADMINISTERS THE CDBG PROGRAM AND DETERMINES WHICH LOCAL PROJECTS RECEIVE FUNDING. ELIGIBLE GRANTEES ARE AS FOLLOWS: PRINCIPAL CITIES OF METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS (MSAS); OTHER METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 50,000; QUALIFIED URBAN COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS OF AT LEAST 200,000 (EXCLUDING THE POPULATION OF ENTITLED CITIES); STATES AND INSULAR AREAS. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS FUNDED UNDER THE CDBG ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM. THE STATE OF HAWAII DOES NOT PARTICIPATE, AND HUD ALLOCATES THE STATE'S SHARE OF FUNDS TO THE THREE HAWAII NON-ENTITLED COUNTIES. THE STATES ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS IN THE STATE CDBG PROGRAM. SINCE STATES ARE IN THE BEST POSITION TO KNOW, AND TO RESPOND TO, THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, CONGRESS AMENDED THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974 (HCD ACT) IN 1981 TO GIVE EACH STATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADMINISTER CDBG FUNDS FOR NON-ENTITLEMENT AREAS.; SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: THE SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES ARE UNKNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2025-09-23$615,563
- Department of TransportationMEDFORD OREGON TRANSPORTATION SAFETY ACTION PLAN UNDER THE SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL (SS4A) PROGRAM.assistance · Last action 2026-06-15$400,000
- Department of JusticeTHE PURPOSE OF THE COPS HIRING PROGRAM (CHP) PROGRAM IS TO ADVANCE THE PRACTICE OF COMMUNITY POLICING THROUGH THE HIRE OR REHIRE OF ADDITIONAL CAREER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. FUNDING UNDER THIS AWARD PROGRAM WILL BE UTILIZED BY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO HIRE AND REHIRE CAREER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS NECESSARY TO INCREASE THE JURISDICTION’S COMMUNITY POLICING CAPACITY TO PREVENT AND DISRUPT CRIME AND VIOLENCE.assistance · Last action 2022-10-13$375,000
- Department of Energy“ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT (EECBG) PROGRAM, BIPARTISAN INFRASTRUCTURE LAW (BIL) SECTION 40552” “THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CONSERVATION BLOCK GRANT (EECBG) PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO ASSIST STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND TRIBES IN IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO REDUCE ENERGY USE, TO REDUCE FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS, AND TO IMPROVE ENERGY EFFICIENCY.”assistance · Last action 2025-09-29$143,430
- Department of JusticeTHE DISPARATE JURISDICTIONS OF THE CITY OF MEDFORD AND JACKSON COUNTY WILL AGAIN USE JAG FUNDS FOR TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS AND CJIS COMPLIANT EQUIPMENT. THE CITY OF MEDFORD WILL USE ITS SHARE OF JAG FUNDS TO PURCHASE WINDOWS 11 COMPATIBLE MOBILE DATA COMPUTERS TO ENHANCE RESPONSE TO CALLS FOR SERVICE AMONG THE PATROL FLEET. JACKSON COUNTY WILL USE ITS SHARE OF JAG FUNDS TO REPLACE RADIOS TO ENHANCE COMMUNICATIONS.assistance · Last action 2024-12-05$44,041
- General Services AdministrationIGF::OT::IGFcontract · Last action 2014-10-29$42,455
- Department of the TreasuryPURPOSE: THE EQUITABLE SHARING PROGRAM ENHANCES COOPERATION AMONGST FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PROVIDING VALUABLE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO THE STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT DIRECTLY PARTICIPATED IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORT RESULTING IN THE FEDERAL FORFEITURE. ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: EQUITABLY SHARED FUNDS ARE TO BE USED FOR AUTHORIZED LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES PURSUANT TO 31 USC 9705 AND TREASURY GUIDELINES. END GOAL/EXPECTED OUTCOMES: TO ENCOURAGE FURTHER COOPERATION BETWEEN THE RECIPIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AS REQUIRED BY 31 USC 9705. BENEFICIARIES: STATE, LOCAL AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES. SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: SHARED FUNDS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO ANY ANOTHER AGENCY. BROADBAND: SPECIFIC AWARDS RELATED TO BROADBAND USAGE ARE NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2025-06-04$38,315
- Department of the TreasuryPURPOSE: THE EQUITABLE SHARING PROGRAM ENHANCES COOPERATION AMONGST FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PROVIDING VALUABLE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO THE STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT DIRECTLY PARTICIPATED IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORT RESULTING IN THE FEDERAL FORFEITURE. ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: EQUITABLY SHARED FUNDS ARE TO BE USED FOR AUTHORIZED LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES PURSUANT TO 31 USC 9705 AND TREASURY GUIDELINES. END GOAL/EXPECTED OUTCOMES: TO ENCOURAGE FURTHER COOPERATION BETWEEN THE RECIPIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AS REQUIRED BY 31 USC 9705. BENEFICIARIES: STATE, LOCAL AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES. SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: SHARED FUNDS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO ANY ANOTHER AGENCY. BROADBAND: SPECIFIC AWARDS RELATED TO BROADBAND USAGE ARE NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2025-07-25$35,363
- General Services AdministrationIGF::OT::IGF SEWER UTILITY SERVICE SERVICE LOCATION: USGS FIELD OFFICE (0R0521MM) STORM DRAIN SERVICES, STREET UTILITY FEE, PARKS AND PUBLIC SAFETY UTILITY FEEcontract · Last action 2015-09-22$15,572
- Department of Veterans AffairsSMALL PURCHASE DATAcontract · Last action 2008-10-01$14,500
- Department of the TreasuryPURPOSE: THE EQUITABLE SHARING PROGRAM ENHANCES COOPERATION AMONGST FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PROVIDING VALUABLE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO THE STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT DIRECTLY PARTICIPATED IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORT RESULTING IN THE FEDERAL FORFEITURE. ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: EQUITABLY SHARED FUNDS ARE TO BE USED FOR AUTHORIZED LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES PURSUANT TO 31 USC 9705 AND TREASURY GUIDELINES. END GOAL/EXPECTED OUTCOMES: TO ENCOURAGE FURTHER COOPERATION BETWEEN THE RECIPIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AS REQUIRED BY 31 USC 9705. BENEFICIARIES: STATE, LOCAL AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES. SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: SHARED FUNDS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO ANY ANOTHER AGENCY. BROADBAND: SPECIFIC AWARDS RELATED TO BROADBAND USAGE ARE NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2025-09-16$10,604
- General Services AdministrationIGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTIONS SEWER AND STORM WATER UTILITY SERVICES USGS BUILDING, MEDFORD, OREGONcontract · Last action 2017-03-17$5,370
- Department of the TreasuryPURPOSE: THE EQUITABLE SHARING PROGRAM ENHANCES COOPERATION AMONGST FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BY PROVIDING VALUABLE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO THE STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT DIRECTLY PARTICIPATED IN THE LAW ENFORCEMENT EFFORT RESULTING IN THE FEDERAL FORFEITURE. ACTIVITIES TO BE PERFORMED: EQUITABLY SHARED FUNDS ARE TO BE USED FOR AUTHORIZED LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES PURSUANT TO 31 USC 9705 AND TREASURY GUIDELINES. END GOAL/EXPECTED OUTCOMES: TO ENCOURAGE FURTHER COOPERATION BETWEEN THE RECIPIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AS REQUIRED BY 31 USC 9705. BENEFICIARIES: STATE, LOCAL AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES. SUBRECIPIENT ACTIVITIES: SHARED FUNDS MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO ANY ANOTHER AGENCY. BROADBAND: SPECIFIC AWARDS RELATED TO BROADBAND USAGE ARE NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF AWARD.assistance · Last action 2025-09-08$3,961
- General Services AdministrationIGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTIONS. STORM WATER UTILITY FEES, MEDFORD, OR, CITY OF MEDFORD.contract · Last action 2016-06-23$2,580
- General Services AdministrationIGF::OT::IGF OTHER FUNCTION - NEW CONTRACT STORMWATER UTILITY SERVICE JA REDDEN USCH - MEDFORD, ORcontract · Last action 2017-07-03$1,958
- General Services AdministrationIGF::OT::IGF SEWER UTILITY SERVICE USGS FIELD OFFICE (OR0521MM) PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE 05/01/2014 - 04/30/2015contract · Last action 2014-04-29$223
- Department of the InteriorCITY OF MEDFORD PARKS RECL CCSPcontract · Last action 2008-03-20$-5,418
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 221310 - WATER SUPPLY AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS. Last action: 2017-07-03. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-19 | Planned | 1 | 1 | $270 | |
| 2023-09-18 | Planned | 3 | 3 | $810 | |
| 2013-11-13 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2013-08-14 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2013-01-10 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2009-05-11 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2007-04-11 | Planned | 3 | 3 | $1,500 | |
| 2004-11-18 | Planned | 4 | 1 | $105 | |
| 2004-09-22 | Planned | 5 | 1 | $200 | |
| 2004-08-16 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2004-05-18 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-09-20 | Complaint | 5 | 5 | $900 | |
| 2001-03-14 | Planned | 3 | 1 | $210 | |
| 2001-03-14 | Programmed Related | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1998-04-15 | Planned | 3 | 2 | $710 | |
| 1998-03-04 | Planned | 2 | — | $0 | |
| 1998-03-04 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1995-03-24 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1993-11-30 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1993-01-28 | Planned | 3 | 2 | $480 | |
| 1992-10-30 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1991-10-15 | Follow-up | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1991-09-04 | Planned | 2 | 2 | $1,000 | |
| 1991-09-03 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1991-08-23 | Planned | 6 | 1 | $600 | |
| 1989-09-19 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 | |
| 1989-06-12 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 1988-05-17 | Planned | 1 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
CITY OF MEDFORD is one of 7 establishments rolled up under the parent organization City of Medford.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of City of Medford across all 7 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in fire protection within OR, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- WEST VALLEY FIRE DISTRICTWILLAMINA — 2 federal enforcement records
- HAUSER RURAL FIRE DEPTNORTH BEND — 1 federal enforcement record
- LANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1VENETA — 1 federal enforcement record
- MALIN RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTMALIN — 1 federal enforcement record
- TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE AND RESCUE VOLUNTEERSHERWOOD — 1 federal enforcement record
- HARRIMAN F P DKLAMATH FALLS — 1 federal enforcement record
- TUALATIN VALLEY FIRE & RESCUEALOHA — 1 federal enforcement record
- SEAL ROCK RURAL FIRE PDSEAL ROCK — 1 federal enforcement record
- LEWIS & CLARK RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTASTORIA — 1 federal enforcement record
- AZALEA RURAL FIRE DISTRICTAZALEA — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Other establishments operated by City of Medford, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- CITY OF MEDFORDMEDFORD, OR — 1 federal enforcement record
- CITY OF MEDFORD FIRE STATION 3Medford, OR — 1 federal enforcement record
- CITY OF MEDFORDCENTRAL POINT, OR — 1 federal enforcement record
Related searches
- All City of Medford locationsParent rollup
- Fire ProtectionAll employers in this industry
- Employers in ORState-wide enforcement data
- Fire Protection in ORIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on CITY OF MEDFORD from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup City of Medford, which operates 7 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is CITY OF MEDFORD's OSHA violation history?
- CITY OF MEDFORD has 28 OSHA inspections on record with 48 violations and $6,785 in total penalties.
- How does CITY OF MEDFORD's safety record compare to its industry?
- CITY OF MEDFORD operates in the fire protection industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 5.1. CITY OF MEDFORD's self-reported DART rate is 3.09 compared to an industry average of 2.9.