Establishment profile
AUTOLIV
250 AMERICAN WAY, BRIGHAM CITY, UT, 84302
Operated by AUTOLIV INC · 1 of 5 establishments
336390 — Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing
EIN 363640053
Summary
AUTOLIV has accumulated 12 OSHA violations across 8 inspections over 27 years of recorded history, with $6,150 in total assessed penalties.
The establishment sits in the 92nd percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 39 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 100th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 1 year ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
AUTOLIV appears in OSHA workplace safety, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, and NHTSA vehicle recalls records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, or CPSC product recalls.
OSHA workplace safety
25% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 12 distinct standards shown · 12 citations in this view · $6,150 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | $1,500 | Sep 2006 | Sep 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 F01 | 1 | 1 | $1,500 | Sep 2006 | Sep 2006 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0303 B02 | 1 | 1 | $1,050 | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C02 II | 1 | 1 | $1,050 | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0119 D03 | 1 | 1 | $1,050 | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G01 III | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 G02 III | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 4001.8 A09 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 D04 II | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 D05 I | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0242 B | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0305 B01 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2002 | Aug 2002 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Peer comparison
Worse on violations than most other employers in NAICS 3363 within UT. Peer group: 39 employers. This establishment has 12 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.
Reported for 1,800 average annual employees at this establishment.
Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for AUTOLIV. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
OSHA accident events
Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.
| Date | Event | Injuries | Hospitalized | Fatalities | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006 | ROTATING PARTS,ABDOMEN,ROTATING SHAFT,WELDING,STRUCK BY,FLYING OBJECT,PUNCTUREFatality | 1 | — | 1 | |
| Sep 4, 1998 | AMPUTATED,FINGER,WORK RULES,THUMB,CAUGHT BETWEEN,CRUSHED,LIGHT CURTAIN | 1 | 1 | — |
Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.
Activity timeline
Most recent federal enforcement activity recorded 1 year ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for AUTOLIV. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for AUTOLIV. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for AUTOLIV. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for AUTOLIV. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for AUTOLIV. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
First case: 2012-06-21. Most recent: 2012-06-21. Source: UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry — federal pleas, DPAs, and NPAs.
Federal prosecution case file
Federal corporate prosecution records from the University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry. DPA = Deferred Prosecution Agreement; NPA = Non-Prosecution Agreement; both are pre-trial settlements where the defendant accepts terms but avoids conviction. Monitor = court-appointed compliance oversight, usually 2-5 years. 1 case · 1 plea/conviction · $14,500,000 in penalties / restitution.
| Case | Date | Disposition | Crime | Jurisdiction | Total payment | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States of America v. Autoliv Inc. Autoliv, Inc. · ALV | Jun 2012 | plea | Antitrust | USDOJ - Antitrust Division | $14,500,000 | No |
Source: University of Virginia Corporate Prosecution Registry (maintained by Prof. Brandon L. Garrett, Duke University). The registry has no state or jurisdiction-of-incorporation field on the company side, so same-name employers in different states may mis-attribute -- verify against the source case documents when precision matters.
NHTSA vehicle & equipment recalls
Most-recalled component: AIR BAGS:SIDE/WINDOW. Most recent campaign: 2025-09-15. Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, matched on manufacturer name.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-20 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2022-03-08 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2006-06-22 | Accident | 2 | 2 | $3,000 | |
| 2006-06-07 | Planned | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2006-01-25 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-06-10 | Complaint | 0 | — | $0 | |
| 2002-02-14 | Planned | 10 | 7 | $3,150 | |
| 1998-09-08 | Accident | 0 | — | $0 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Part of a larger organization
AUTOLIV is one of 5 establishments rolled up under the parent organization AUTOLIV INC.
Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of AUTOLIV INC across all 5 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.
Other employers in this industry and state
Other employers in other motor vehicle parts manufacturing within UT, ordered by federal enforcement volume:
- AUTOLIV ASP, INC.OGDEN — 1 federal enforcement record
- AUTOLIV ASP INCBRIGHAM CITY — 1 federal enforcement record
- DIRT WARRIOR ACCESSORIESSAINT GEORGE — 1 federal enforcement record
- SIGNATURE EQUIPMENT CORPORATIONSALT LAKE CITY — 1 federal enforcement record
- TERAFLEX INC.WEST JORDAN — 1 federal enforcement record
- ACCU-FORM PLASTICS INCHURRICANE — 1 federal enforcement record
Other locations under this parent
Related searches
- All AUTOLIV INC locationsParent rollup
- Other Motor Vehicle Parts ManufacturingAll employers in this industry
- Employers in UTState-wide enforcement data
- Other Motor Vehicle in UTIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on AUTOLIV from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup AUTOLIV INC, which operates 5 establishments in our dataset.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is AUTOLIV's OSHA violation history?
- AUTOLIV has 8 OSHA inspections on record with 12 violations and $6,150 in total penalties.
- How does AUTOLIV's safety record compare to its industry?
- AUTOLIV operates in the other motor vehicle parts manufacturing industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 3. AUTOLIV's self-reported DART rate is 1 compared to an industry average of 1.9.
- Has AUTOLIV had any workplace fatalities?
- Yes. Federal records show 1 fatality investigation involving AUTOLIV.