Skip to main content

Establishment profile

APM TERMINALS

5080 MCLESTER STREET, ELIZABETH, NJ, 07207
Operated by APM Terminals · 1 of 2 establishments
488320Marine Cargo Handling

Download as PDF →

OSHA inspections
10
over 21 years
Violations
4
$20,250 in penalties
Penalties
$20,250
$5,063 avg
Violations across 2 federal agencies
Enforcement actions from multiple agencies may indicate systemic compliance issues across functions.
Accident investigations on record
4 fatalities · 1 hospitalizations · 1 National Emphasis Program inspections · 2 OSHA follow-ups

Summary

APM TERMINALS has accumulated 4 OSHA violations across 10 inspections over 21 years of recorded history, with $20,250 in total assessed penalties.

The establishment sits in the 64th percentile for violations within its industry-state peer group of 48 employers. Inspection frequency runs at the 96th percentile. The most recent enforcement activity was recorded 6 years ago.

Federal records were found in 2 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.

Agency coverage

APM TERMINALS appears in OSHA workplace safety and NLRB labor relations records only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls.

OSHA workplace safety

Inspections
10
0.5 / yr · last 21 yrs
Violations
4
0.2 / yr
Penalties
$20,250
$5,063 avg / violation
50% serious50% other
Inspection trigger · referral
4 of 10
Inspection trigger · accident
3 of 10

30% of inspections at this establishment produced violations, with 2 inspections producing serious-or-greater violations.

Most-cited OSHA standards

Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 4 distinct standards shown · 4 citations in this view · $20,250 in penalties.

CFR sectionCitationsInspectionsTotal penaltyFirst citedLast cited
29 CFR 1917.0071 D0111$7,000Feb 2016Feb 2016
29 CFR 1917.0071 E11$5,000Feb 2016Feb 2016
29 CFR 1917.0011 A11$5,000Jan 2005Jan 2005
29 CFR 1917.0043 C0511$3,250Mar 2012Mar 2012

Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.

Peer comparison

64th

Above average violations in NAICS 4883 within NJ. Peer group: 48 employers. This establishment has 4 OSHA violations; peer median is 2.

Fewer violationsMore violations
Penalty percentile
91st
peer median: $80
Inspection frequency
96th
peer median: 2

Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)

Recordable injury rates the employer filed with OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application. DART covers cases with days away, restricted, or transferred; TRIR is the total recordable case rate.

DART rate
1.4
vs industry
−0.4
TRIR
1.4
vs industry
−1.0

Reported for 971 average annual employees at this establishment.

Source: OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported). Rates are per 100 full-time equivalent workers. Establishments below the ~10-FTE threshold are not required to report.

Industry benchmark

Industry avg TRIR
2.4
BLS SOII 2024
Industry avg DART
1.8
BLS SOII 2024
Self-reported TRIR
1.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A (employer self-reported)

BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.

Inspection breakdown

Accident
3
Referral
4

Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.

OSHA severe injury reports

Self-reported events under 29 CFR 1904.39 (24-hour notification of hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) · Oct 2015 – Aug 2025 · 3 in last 5 years

Reports
6
Hospitalizations
5
Amputations
1
Eye losses
0

Most frequent event: Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects, unspecified

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports (federal OSHA only; state-plan states like California, Oregon, and Washington maintain their own programs and do not consistently report into this feed).

Severe injury reports — events

Each row is a hospitalization, amputation, or eye-loss event the employer self-reported to OSHA under 29 CFR 1904.39. Narratives are written by the reporting employer.

DateEventBody partOutcome
Aug 12, 2025Exposure to environmental heat outdoorBODY SYSTEMSHospitalized
Mar 3, 2025Fall, contact incident onboard water vehicleOther finger(s) n.e.c.Hospitalized
Mar 10, 2021Nonroadway collision with other vehicle, unspecifiedNonclassifiableHospitalized
Aug 13, 2020Other fall to lower level, unspecifiedMultiple leg locations, unspecifiedHospitalized
Feb 19, 2020Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in nonroadway areaNonclassifiableHospitalized
Oct 6, 2015Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects, unspecifiedHand(s), n.e.c.Amputation

Source: OSHA Severe Injury Reports. Federal-OSHA jurisdiction only by default; some state-plan programs report voluntarily.

OSHA accident events

Accidents, fatalities, and catastrophes documented during OSHA inspections at this employer. Each entry links to the inspection that recorded it.

DateEventInjuriesHospitalizedFatalities
Feb 19, 2020Struck By,Trailer,Truck11
Aug 7, 2015Crushed,Longshoring,Material Handling,Struck ByFatality11
Feb 28, 2007CARDIOVASC SYSTEM,SHIPYARD,DOCK,HEART ATTACK,TRUCK DRIVERFatality11
Sep 26, 2005CHEST,HEART,HEART ATTACKFatality11
Aug 10, 2004LOADER,STRUCK BY,RUN OVERFatality11

Source: OSHA accident investigations. Narratives are recorded by the inspecting officer and may be truncated.

Activity timeline

Data refreshed
Weekly
First OSHA inspection
Most recent activity
6 years ago

No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 6+ years. Most recent activity: 6 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.

Wage & Hour Division (WHD)

No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for APM TERMINALS. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division

Mine safety (MSHA)

No MSHA mine safety violations on file for APM TERMINALS. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration

Labor relations (NLRB)

Company-level in NJ — for APM Terminals, not this location alone

Total cases
6
Unfair labor practice
6

National Labor Relations Board — unfair labor practice charges and union representation cases. The NLRB records cases at the company/regional level (no worksite address), so these are matched by company name and state and may span other APM Terminals locations in the same state.

NLRB cases

National Labor Relations Board cases involving this employer. Includes unfair labor practice (ULP) filings and representation election proceedings. NLRB enforcement is process-driven; no per-case monetary penalty is assessed (remedies are case-by-case backpay orders, posting requirements, election re-runs, etc.). 6 cases · 6 ULP

Case numberTypeFiledClosedStatusRegion
22-CA-325031Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-324758Unfair labor practiceAug 2023Oct 2023ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-320872Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-320834Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-320782Unfair labor practiceJun 2023Aug 2023ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey
22-CA-028440Unfair labor practiceJul 2008Aug 2008ClosedRegion 22, Newark, New Jersey

Source: NLRB case files. Rows shown are those the agency has published. Region numbers (1–31) correspond to NLRB's geographic offices.

Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical

No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for APM TERMINALS. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification

Environmental compliance (EPA)

No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for APM TERMINALS. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency

Federal criminal prosecution record

No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for APM TERMINALS. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry

Inspection history

DateTriggerViolationsSeriousPenalty
2020-02-21Unprogrammed Related0$0
2020-02-21Referral0$0
2016-01-14Fatality/Catastrophe0$0
2015-10-06Referral0$0
2015-09-18Referral0$0
2015-08-10Fatality/Catastrophe21$12,000
2012-02-22Referral11$3,250
2007-02-28Accident0$0
2005-10-04Accident0$0
2004-08-11Accident1$5,000

Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.

In the news

Part of a larger organization

APM TERMINALS is one of 2 establishments rolled up under the parent organization APM Terminals.

Federal enforcement records on this page represent activity at this specific establishment only. The full enforcement footprint of APM Terminals across all 2 of its tracked locations is viewable on the parent profile.

Other employers in this industry and state

Other employers in marine cargo handling within NJ, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Other locations under this parent

Other establishments operated by APM Terminals, ordered by federal enforcement volume:

Related searches

About this data

This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on APM TERMINALS from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.

Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code. This establishment resolves to the parent rollup APM Terminals, which operates 2 establishments in our dataset.

OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.

Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.

Contact sales →

Frequently asked

What is APM TERMINALS's OSHA violation history?
APM TERMINALS has 10 OSHA inspections on record with 4 violations and $20,250 in total penalties.
How does APM TERMINALS's safety record compare to its industry?
APM TERMINALS operates in the marine cargo handling industry. The industry average Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) is 2.4. APM TERMINALS's self-reported DART rate is 1.4 compared to an industry average of 1.8.
Has APM TERMINALS had any workplace fatalities?
Yes. Federal records show 4 fatality investigations involving APM TERMINALS.