Summary
ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC. has accumulated 3 OSHA violations across 1 inspection over 16 years of recorded history, with $610 in total assessed penalties.
The most recent federal enforcement activity was recorded 17 years ago.
Federal records were found in 1 of 15 sources. Sources without matching records returned empty for this establishment.
Agency coverage
ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC. appears in OSHA workplace safety record only. No matching records were found in WHD wage enforcement, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental compliance, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa and labor certification (historical), FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov federal debarment, CMS nursing home enforcement, UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry, CPSC product recalls, or NHTSA vehicle recalls. Single-agency enforcement records typically indicate either a discrete incident-based inspection or a low-risk operational profile.
OSHA workplace safety
100% of inspections at this establishment produced violations,
Most-cited OSHA standards
Top OSHA standards cited at this employer, ranked by citation count. Standards (CFR sections) cluster citations into safety themes -- machine guarding, lockout-tagout, hazard communication, fall protection, process safety, etc. A concentration on one or two sections reveals a pattern that individual citations don’t. 3 distinct standards shown · 3 citations in this view · $610 in penalties.
| CFR section | Citations | Inspections | Total penalty | First cited | Last cited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 CFR 1910.0212 A01 | 1 | 1 | $610 | Aug 2009 | Aug 2009 |
| 29 CFR 1910.0147 C04 I | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2009 | Aug 2009 |
| 29 CFR 1910.1200 E01 | 1 | 1 | — | Aug 2009 | Aug 2009 |
Source: OSHA inspection citations (violation_detail). CFR section codes can be looked up at osha.gov/laws-regs for the formal standard text. Per-inspection detail and the specific violation descriptions are available by expanding individual inspections below.
Safety self-report (OSHA 300A)
No self-reported injury rates filed with OSHA's Injury Tracking Application for ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with OSHA Injury Tracking Application →
Industry benchmark
BLS rates reflect industry-wide averages. Self-reported figures come from OSHA’s Injury Tracking Application; absence of self-reported data does not necessarily indicate non-compliance — many establishments fall below the ITA reporting threshold.
Inspection breakdown
Complaint- and accident-triggered inspections are stronger risk signals than routine planned inspections.
OSHA severe injury reports
No severe injury reports (hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye) on file under 29 CFR 1904.39 for ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Occupational Safety and Health Administration →
Activity timeline
No federal enforcement activity has been recorded against this establishment in 17+ years. Most recent activity: 17 years ago. Data on this page is refreshed weekly.
Wage & Hour Division (WHD)
No WHD wage, overtime, or child-labor enforcement cases on file for ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Wage and Hour Division →
Mine safety (MSHA)
No MSHA mine safety violations on file for ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Mine Safety and Health Administration →
Labor relations (NLRB)
No NLRB unfair labor practice charges or union representation cases on file for ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with National Labor Relations Board →
Visa & labor certification (OFLC) — historical
No H-1B, H-2A, or H-2B labor condition applications on file (historical data only — DOL ended OFLC publication) for ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Office of Foreign Labor Certification →
Environmental compliance (EPA)
No EPA inspections or formal enforcement actions on file for ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with Environmental Protection Agency →
Federal criminal prosecution record
No federal criminal prosecutions, plea agreements, or deferred-prosecution agreements on file for ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.. Verify directly with UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry →
Federal contracts
This location
- Department of DefenseR&D SBIR PHASE II TOPIC N08-026contract · Last action 2020-10-21$953,682
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationWHILE IN THE 1970'S AND 1980'S, COMPOSITES WERE ADOPTED FOR AEROSPACE STRUCTURE FOR INCREASED PERFORMANCE AND WEIGHT SAVINGS, THE 1990'S AND 2000'S WITNESSED THE ATTENTION TOWARDS COST-EFFECTIVE FABRICATION. ALL THERMOSET PROCESSES THAT UTILIZE SUCH MACHINES RELY ON AUTOCLAVES TO CONSOLIDATE THE LAMINATES, AT SIGNIFICANT ACQUISITION AND OPERATIONAL EXPENSE. AUTOCLAVES TO CONSOLIDATE WINGS ARE HUGELY EXPENSIVE. AUTOCLAVES FOR FUSELAGES ARE NEARLY COST-PROHIBITIVE (ONLY ONE EXISTS). AUTOCLAVES FOR THE ARES V DO NOT EXIST. THE MARKETPLACE WOULD WELCOME A PROVEN OUT-OF-AUTOCLAVE FABRICATION TECHNOLOGY. THE TASKS IN THE ASI/UD-CCM STTR PHASE 1 WAS TO ASSESS THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CURRENT TP-ATP HEADS, DO A MODEL BASED PARAMETRIC STUDY TO DETERMINE POSSIBLE HEAD AND PROCESS PARAMETER CHANGES AND DEMONSTRATE AN IMPROVED UNDERSTANDING OF THE HEAD, WITH A GOAL OF AUTOCLAVE LEVEL PROPERTIES. A SET OF MODELS FOR THE IN SITU AUTOMATED TOW/TAPE PLACEMENT (ATP) PROCESSES THAT CAPTURE THE IMPORTANT PROCESS PHENOMENA WERE DEVELOPED BY UD-CCM. ACCUDYNE THEN MEASURED THE LAMINATE ROUGHNESS, FABRICATED SAMPLES USING A VARIETY OF CONDITIONS AND TESTED THE SAMPLES. TESTING OF THE LAMINATES INDICATE: PLACING WITH FLAT TAPE AND USING IMPROVED HEAD CHILLING INCREASES MECHANICAL PROPERTIES. COMPACTING WITH ONLY A LOAD REDUCES PROPERTIES. USING A VACUUM BAG OVEN RECONSOLIDATION IS INEFFECTIVE, AND EVEN REDUCES MECHANICAL PROPERTIES. THE PHASE 2 PROGRAM INNOVATION IS TO DEVELOP AND DEPLOY UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE PROCESS MODELS TO ACCUDYNE'S THERMOPLASTIC TOW AND TAPE PLACEMENT HEAD TO REMEDY THE MECHANICAL PROPERTY SHORTFALL BETWEEN THE TWO FABRICATION PROCESSES USED TO MANUFACTURE LARGE COMPOSITE AEROSPACE STRUCTURE IMPORTANT TO NASA. AN ADDITIONAL ADVANTAGE THAT WOULD ACCRUE BY ADOPTING TP-ATP WOULD BE THE USE OF NOVEL THERMOPLASTIC MATERIALS WITH THERMAL STABILITY AND TOUGHNESS FAR IN EXCESS OF WHAT THERMOSETTING MATERIALS CAN ACHIEVE.contract · Last action 2011-06-24$599,487
- National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationOUT-OF-AUTOCLAVE THERMOPLASTIC TAPE/TOW PLACEMENT (TP-ATP) IS NEARING COMMERCIALIZATION BUT SUFFERS A MODERATE GAP IN MECHANICAL PROPERTIES COMPARED WITH LAMINATES FABRICATED VIA THERMOSET AUTOCLAVE PROCESSING. OUT-OF-AUTOCLAVE THERMOPLASTIC PROCESSING SIGNIFICANTLY LOWERS COMPOSITE AEROSPACE PART COSTS BUT THE PROPERTY GAP MUST BE CLOSED. THIS STTR PROGRAM ENDORSED HEREIN BY BOEING AND CYTEC ENGINEERED MATERIALS WILL REMEDY THE MECHANICAL PROPERTY SHORTFALL AND ENABLE LARGE COMPOSITE AEROSPACE STRUCTURE IMPORTANT TO NASA TO BE MANUFACTURED WITHOUT AN AUTOCLAVE. ACCUDYNE IS TEAMING WITH UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE A CENTER FOR COMPOSITE MATERIALS TO APPLY THEIR STATE-OF-THE-ART TP-ATP PROCESS/PROPERTY MODELS TO ELUCIDATE THE PHYSICAL MECHANISMS AFFECTING MICROSTRUCTURAL QUALITY THAT CAUSE THE PROPERTY GAP. MODELS WILL BE APPLIED TO THE NASA LARC TP-ATP DEPOSITION HEAD TO OPTIMIZE THE HEAD CONFIGURATION AND MACHINE OPERATING PARAMETERS AND THE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR FULL MECHANICAL PROPERTIES. LAMINATES WILL BE MANUFACTURED TO DEMONSTRATE THE PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS. THE PROCESS HEAD AND EQUIPMENT CHANGES WILL BE UPGRADED ON THE NASA-LARC THERMOPLASTIC TAPE HEAD. IN PHASE 2 PROCESS/HEAD MODELING WILL BE EXTENDED THROUGH LAMINATE FABRICATION AND TESTING AND A COMPONENT OF INTEREST TO NASA WILL BE FABRICATED DEMONSTRATING THE IMPROVED AUTOCLAVE LEVEL MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE.contract · Last action 2008-03-05$99,935
- Department of DefenseFINAL REPORT SBIR TOPIC N08-135contract · Last action 2008-09-15$79,924
- Department of DefenseR & D SBIR PHASE I TOPIC N08-026contract · Last action 2008-03-27$67,823
Federal contract dollars to this establishment. Primary NAICS: 541712 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE PHYSICAL, ENGINEERING, AND LIFE SCIENCES (EXCEPT BIOTECHNOLOGY). Last action: 2020-10-21. Source: USAspending.gov, net obligations. Recipient address is the SAM registration / HQ address, not necessarily the worksite.
Inspection history
| Date | Trigger | Violations | Serious | Penalty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-07-30 | Planned | 3 | 1 | $610 |
Source: OSHA IMIS. Citation amounts reflect initially assessed penalties; final amounts after appeal may differ.
In the news
Related searches
- NAICS 333All employers in this industry
- Employers in DEState-wide enforcement data
- Industry in DEIndustry × state cross-filter
About this data
This profile aggregates federal enforcement records on ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC. from every major federal compliance and enforcement source plus the UVA Corporate Prosecution Registry. OSHA workplace safety inspections, WHD wage cases, MSHA mine safety, EPA environmental enforcement, NLRB labor relations, OFLC visa/labor certification, FMCSA motor carrier registration, SAM.gov debarments, CMS nursing-home records, BLS industry safety benchmarks, OSHA ITA self-reported injury rates, SEC enforcement and financial disclosures, CPSC and NHTSA recalls.
Establishments are matched across agencies using normalized employer name, state, and ZIP code.
OSHA citations typically appear 3–8 months after the inspection, so very recent enforcement actions may not yet be reflected. Profiles may be incomplete if the establishment operates under multiple legal names or files under variations our entity-matching rules don’t yet cover. To report a missing record or correction, email corrections@fastdol.com.
Need API access, bulk download, or licensed redistribution? The website is free. Programmatic and licensed access is handled separately.
Contact sales →Frequently asked
- What is ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC.'s OSHA violation history?
- ACCUDYNE SYSTEMS, INC. has 1 OSHA inspection on record with 3 violations and $610 in total penalties.